|
|
Post by Darth Stateworker on Jun 26, 2012 19:49:29 GMT -5
Now that the election is done, I'd really like to know how the new administration plans to preemptively strike over the Triborough issue - because that's what needs to be done - by ALL unions together.
|
|
|
|
Post by NYS Techie on Jun 26, 2012 20:09:33 GMT -5
I wouldn't pre-emptively strike... What I'd do is find a law professor who's an expert on the subject, and have him provide an article to the Times Union about how removing Triborough would lead directly to the RIGHT to strike. Then I would issue public statements about the lawsuit we're going to throw if Triborough gets overturned, and the strike we'll throw after that.
Remember, if we strike now, we get charged two days per day. We are not currently allowed to strike. We have to wait for them to make a move on Triborough, then crush that move in court (or regain the right to strike, whichever).
|
|
|
|
Post by Darth Stateworker on Jun 26, 2012 21:42:44 GMT -5
Not strike as in "go out on a strike". Strike as in - start working against the potential legislation NOW. Start lobbying. Start a public education campaign on it. ETC.
|
|
|
|
Post by NYS Techie on Jun 26, 2012 22:33:11 GMT -5
Oooohhhh... I get it. My bad.
|
|
|
|
Post by Darth Stateworker on Jun 26, 2012 22:45:42 GMT -5
Oooohhhh... I get it. My bad. LOL |
|
|
|
Post by warmcuckoounfed on Jun 27, 2012 4:18:22 GMT -5
Regaining the right to strike would require the repeal of the Taylor Law, no?
|
|
|
|
Post by Darth Stateworker on Jun 27, 2012 7:52:34 GMT -5
Regaining the right to strike would require the repeal of the Taylor Law, no? A repeal or at least a change to it. A full repeal of Taylor would be bad... Very bad. But a repeal of only the subsection dealing with strikes would be good and what we should DEMAND should they alter Triborough in any way. |
|
|
|
Post by warmcuckoounfed on Jun 27, 2012 20:24:24 GMT -5
Regaining the right to strike would require the repeal of the Taylor Law, no? A repeal or at least a change to it. A full repeal of Taylor would be bad... Very bad. But a repeal of only the subsection dealing with strikes would be good and what we should DEMAND should they alter Triborough in any way. Whoops! Of course you're correct on this. Serves me right for posting in post-election euphoria! |
|
dw240
New Member
Posts: 1
|
Post by dw240 on Jul 14, 2012 10:30:36 GMT -5
It is worth noting that prior to the Triborough Amendment most CBAs provided a clause similar to the following:
"In the event a successor contract or provisions are not agreed upon on or before the termination date of the present contract or provisions, all terms of the present contract and all working conditions will remain in effect until the successor contract or provisions have been entered into. Upon agreement all salaries, benefits and working conditions will be retroactive to the termination date of the present contract or provisions."
Once the Triborough Amendment was passed this provision was removed from most CBAs as superfluous.
Perhaps we should insist that such a provision be included in our next contract. If they do not foresee any changes to the Triborough Amendment then it is superfluous, if they balk . . .
|
|
|
|
Post by Darth Stateworker on Jul 14, 2012 10:41:59 GMT -5
Welcome dw!
I've noted that myself in my discussions on EJ's site. EJ tends to ignore it. But, should Triborough fall, insisting on such language in future contracts would render the loss of Triborough moot. Excellent observation.
|
|
|
|
Post by christopher on Jul 14, 2012 16:48:20 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by LesGaiz on Sept 25, 2019 7:34:13 GMT -5
Metformin And Cephalexin Interaction Strep And Amoxicillin viagra prescription Cheap Pills Super Kamagra Gunstig |
|
|
|
Post by LesGaiz on Jan 14, 2020 17:20:47 GMT -5
Cialis Mezza Pastiglia Want To Buy Isotretinoin Comprar Levitra Generico En Espana <a href=http://cialibuy.com>Buy Cialis</a> Clomid Plus Decapeptyl
|
|
